Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration Program (GLFER)

Published Jan. 16, 2024
Updated: July 25, 2024
 

 

Congress found that the Great Lakes comprise of nationally and internationally significant fishery and ecosystem that should be developed and enhanced in a coordinated manner. Section 506 authorized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to cooperate with other federal, state, and local agencies to plan, implement, and evaluate projects supporting the restoration of the fishery, ecosystem, and beneficial uses of the Great Lakes, with 35 percent matching funds from non-federal project sponsors.

Projects that restore fish and wildlife habitat, remove dams and other barriers to fish migration, prevent and control non-native invasive species, and contribute to the removal of beneficial use impairments in Areas of Concern are eligible for funding through the program. 

Program Overview

The Water Resources Development Act of 2000 authorized the Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration Program, which authorizes the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to plan, implement, and evaluate projects supporting the restoration of the fishery, ecosystem, and beneficial uses of the Great Lakes. Projects that have restored fish and wildlife habitat, removed dams and other barriers to fish migration, prevented and controlled non-native invasive species, and eliminated beneficial use impairments in Areas of Concern have been implemented under the authority.

The authorization actively involves signatories to A Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries, which are state, provincial, tribal, and federal fisheries management agencies as facilitated by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission. As such, the Council of Lake Committees, a group of senior fishery managers representing the eight Great Lakes states, the province of Ontario, and the U.S. tribes, formed the Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration Program Project Review Committee. This Project Review Committee is responsible for assisting the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers soliciting and reviewing proposals, making recommendations for consideration for funding, and assisting in developing and implementing selected projects.

The GLFER Project Review Committee consists of 13 members from fishery management agencies from across the Great Lakes basin. The GLFER Project Review Committee meets bi-annually to evaluate proposals and facilitate project implementation.

GLFER Projects

Recent Projects
Port Clinton Coastal Wetland Restoration, Port Clinton, Ohio
Image of a lake with algae.
Port Clinton Coastal Wetland Restoration, Port Clinton, Ohio
Buffalo District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, partnered with the city of Port Clinton to restore 12 acres of Lake Erie coastal habitat. Invasive species treatment targeting phragmites was applied across the entire 12.2-acre wetland and beach complex. In addition, 4.6 acres of the existing wetland was restored with native plant species and microtopography, and another 1.4 acres of coastal wetland were created through excavation. This project was completed in 2024. This project improves biodiversity and provides coastal habitat for migratory birds, amphibians, and other aquatic organisms.
Photo By: Joshua Unghire
VIRIN: 220829-F-IQ439-001
Buffalo District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, partnered with the city of Port Clinton to restore 12 acres of Lake Erie coastal habitat. Invasive species treatment targeting phragmites was applied across the entire 12.2-acre wetland and beach complex.  In addition, 4.6 acres of the existing wetland was restored with native plant species and microtopography, and another 1.4 acres of coastal wetland were created through excavation.  This project was completed in 2024.  This project improves biodiversity and provides coastal habitat for migratory birds, amphibians, and other aquatic organisms.
Frankenmuth Rock Ramp, Cass River, Michigan
Aerial photo of a stream with a rock ramp.
Frankenmuth Rock Ramp Project, Cass River, Michigan
This fish passage project was completed in 2015 which included construction of a rock ramp structure over the 100-year-old dam. This project reconnected 73 miles of the Cass River and provided over 1,000 miles of additional tributary habitat to Great Lakes migratory fish species.
Photo By: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
VIRIN: 190319-F-IQ439-004
This fish passage project was completed in 2015 which included construction of a rock ramp structure over the 100-year-old dam. This project reconnected 73 miles of the Cass River and provided over 1,000 miles of additional tributary habitat to Great Lakes migratory fish species.
Underwood Creek Fish Passage, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
Low angle shot of a stream from Underwood Creek
Underwood Creek Fish Passage Project, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
This tributary habitat restoration project was completed in 2018 which included removal of approximately 4,000 linear feet of concrete channel and installation of natural stream features include gravel, cobble substrate, meanders, and deep riffle-pool complexes. This project also provided connectivity to the Menomonee River, and re-established access to 400 acres of wetland habitat and an additional 140 acres of northern pike spawning habitat.
Photo By: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
VIRIN: 190317-A-IQ439-001
This tributary habitat restoration project was completed in 2018 which included removal of approximately 4,000 linear feet of concrete channel and installation of natural stream features including gravel, cobble substrate, meanders, and deep riffle-pool complexes. This project also provided connectivity to the Menomonee River, and re-established access to 400 acres of wetland habitat and an additional 140 acres of northern pike spawning habitat.

To date, the GLFER program has restored fish and wildlife habitat, removed dams and other barriers to fish migration, prevented and controlled non-native species, and contributed to the removal of beneficial use impairments in Areas of Concern by implementing a number of projects across the Great Lakes Basin.

Twenty-three projects have been completed under the GLFER authority to date including:

These projects have restored over 1,900 acres of high-quality fish and wildlife habitat, and connected, restored, or protected nearly 1,500 miles of high-quality tributary habitat. In addition, there are approximately 25 projects that are in various stages of completion that will restore 800 acres of high-quality fish and wildlife habitat, and connect, restore, or protect nearly 6,000 miles of high-quality tributary habitat. Together, the Corps of Engineers, Joint Strategic Plan agencies, and non-federal sponsors are collectively achieving the GLFER objective to restore the fishery, ecosystem, and beneficial uses of the Great Lakes.
Project Number Project Restoration
3 Frankenmuth Dam, MI 73 miles reconnected
4 63rd Street Beach, IL 21 acres restored
5 Red Mill Pond, IN 160 acres restored
6 Burnham Prairie, IL 93 acres restored
7 Orland Perimeter, IL 946 acres restored
8 Ivanhoe South Ridge, IN 33 acres restored
8 Calumet Prairie, IL 144 acres restored
9 Little Calumet River Riparian, IL 43 acres restored
10 Underwood Creek, WI 1 mile restored
11 Northerly Island, IL 91 acres restored
12 Rosewood Park Coastal, IL 5 acres restored
13 Jackson Park, IL 162 acres restored
14 Lake County Ravine #8, IL 5 acres restored
15 Ft. Sheridan Coastal Reefs, IL 200 acres restored
16 Jeorse Park, IL 44 acres restored
17 River Riparian, IL 48 miles restored/td>
18 Harpersfield Sea Lamprey Barrier, OH 1,266 miles protected
19 Port Clinton Coastal, OH 18 acres restored
25 East Au Gres River Sea Lamprey Trap, MI 12 miles protected
26 Elkhart River Dam, IN 30 miles reconnected
35 Sabin Dam, MI 1 mile reconnected
38 Menominee and Park Mill Dams Fish Passage, WI/MI 21 miles reconnected
41 Chautauqua Fish Passage, NY 10 miles reconnected/protected

Program Implementation

Eligible projects are those that involve the restoration of aquatic and riparian habitats that may promote the natural reproduction and stability of fish communities as well as those that may aid in the control of the introduction or spread of invasive species in the Great Lakes.

Who

Non-federal sponsors must submit an application as a statement of their intent to participate in supporting the project and acknowledging its financial responsibilities in the study and project.

Non-Federal sponsors may include state, tribal, or local entities, or non-government organizations (NGO).

For example, state departments such as the Department of Natural Resources, tribal groups such as the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, or may be local municipalities such as the city of Chicago, Illinois or other local entities such as forest preserve districts, park districts, school districts, conservation groups, or other non-government organizations including the Great Lakes Fishery Commission.

What

Eligible projects may be those that improve and protect wetlands, tributaries & associated riparian zones, reefs, shoreline habitat, connecting waterways to the Great Lakes, water quality and quantity, and other physical and biological components that promote healthy and productive fish communities in the Great Lakes.

Eligible projects can include compatible recreational features like boardwalks, fishing piers, and more in the design and construction, however costs of such features cannot exceed 10% of the total federal costs.

Side view of the Harpersfield Dam Project.
SLIDESHOW | 2 images | Harpersfield Dam GLFER Project The barrier construction project for the Harpersfield Dam in Ohio was proposed to prevent sea lamprey passage and reproduction from approximately 1,266 miles upstream of the dam on the Grand River and its tributaries.

Where

Projects must be within the Great Lakes basin and must be projects that support the restoration of the Great Lakes fishery, ecosystem, or to restore beneficial uses of the Great Lakes.

Costs

The total project cost must be less than $15 million but may not exceed $10 million of federal dollars.

Suitability Criteria & Confirming Eligibility

If the applicant is an eligible non-federal sponsor and meets these three suitability criteria:  

  1. Addresses one or more of the Program Objectives
  2. Involves planning, design, and construction activities where USACE’s expertise would significantly aid in project completion
  3. Is consistent with USACE policy

Then the district will confirm the eligibility of the proposed project and forward the collected project information to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission or their designee.

In order to apply for funding through the Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration Program, an applicant needs to have:

  1. An initial idea (or more) for a structural project to support the restoration of the Great Lakes fishery, ecosystem, or to restore beneficial uses of the Great Lakes,
  2. A project idea that meets USACE suitability criteria for eligible projects, including total project costs of <$15 million
  3. A non-federal sponsor, which agrees to cost-share the project at a rate of 65% (federal):35% (non-federal).  A non-federal sponsor can be a public or tribal entity, a non-governmental organization, or certain private entities. 
  4. A non-federal sponsor that owns (or is able to acquire) the land for project implementation and be willing to move land ownership to Corps of Engineers during project implementation.  Land ownership will revert back to non-federal sponsor(s) or individuals after project completion. 
  5. And lastly, a non-federal sponsor that is willing to commit to operation and maintenance of the project post-completion.
What is Cost Sharing?

Cost-sharing means that Corps of Engineers and the non-federal sponsor will partner to share the costs of project feasibility, design, and implementation.  The Corps of Engineers will pay for 65% of the total project costs, while the non-federal sponsor will pay for 35% of the total project costs.  Cost-sharing can include both contributions of cash to complete the project, and in-kind contributions, however, contribution of cash or in-kind cannot be federally provided funds.  For GLFER projects, two cost-share agreements are required:

  1. Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement in which details study task responsibilities, descriptions, and milestones, as well as study timelines, study costs, and cost-sharing arrangements
  2. Project Partnership Agreement in which the Corps of Engineers and the non-federal sponsor agree to the project description, responsibilities of the parties, milestones, and cost-sharing when implementing the project (design and construction)

Non-federal cost shares can include in-kind contributions up to 100% of the non-federal sponsor shares.  Several items are eligible for in-kind contributions.  Examples of in-kind contributions for the Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement include:

  1. Preparation of portions of the feasibility study
  2. Environmental Assessments and Compliance document preparation
  3. Technical data collection (e.g. surveys, mapping, geotechnical)
  4. Conceptual design, hydraulic modeling costs

Examples of in-kind contributions for the Project Partnership Agreement include:

  1. Value of Real Estate (Land, Easements, Right of Way, Relocation, and Disposal)
  2. Engineering/design documentation
  3. Technical data (environmental, economic, etc.)
  4. Historical property survey and evaluation
  5. Construction activities

All in-kind contributions must be identified prior to signing Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement or the Project Partnership Agreements.  USACE staff will work with the non-federal sponsor to identify, define, and coordinate in-kind contributions prior to each phase of the project and capture those in the respective agreements.

Section 506 chart depicting timeline for feasibility and design.
Section 506 Project Development Process
An infographic showing the project development process. The feasibility and design phase can range from two to six years.
Photo By: U.S. Corps of Engineers
VIRIN: 190307-F-IQ439-006

Requests are submitted to the commander of the district in which your proposed project resides.
Copy text to your preferred letterhead, edit fields, and send to make a formal request.

In accordance with the provisions of the Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration Program (GLFER), (Name of Agency or Community), requests the Corps of Engineers assistance in (describe the reason for the request). We request that the Corps investigate the possibility of preparing a feasibility study under its GLFER Authority, Section 506 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, as amended, to formulate a restoration plan.

We believe this project would restore (type of benefits, e.g. wetlands, fish habitat). We understand that the study will investigate alternative solutions to identify a plan to restore or create aquatic and ecologically related habitats. We intend to pursue budgetary actions so that funds will be available to meet our cost sharing requirements at the time needed by the Corps to advertise a construction contract.

The Feasibility Phase is federally funded up to $100,000.  We understand that the cost share arrangement above the initial $100,000 for feasibility is 65% federal and 35% local and that there is a 65% federal and 35% local cost share requirement for design and construction, which could include in-kind services. However, our ability to commit to that future cost share is dependent upon preliminary designs, plans, and actual cost estimates.

We understand the sponsors would be responsible for removal of all hazardous, toxic, and radioactive wastes prior to any construction and for the operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of the project after it is completed. 

We are aware that this letter serves as an expression of intent and is not a contractual obligation and that either party may discontinue the study process at any stage prior to construction.

The (name of agency or community) has designated (name of local contact at agency and phone number) as the point of contact for this project.

Sincerely,

Agency Official

 

Email formal request letters and other inquiries to glfer@usace.army.mil.


Chick Lock

Through deeds, not words, we are BUILDING STRONG®